Omar Karmi, Foreign Correspondent
- Last Updated: November 03. 2008 10:54PM UAE / November 3. 2008 6:54PM GMT
RAMALLAH, WEST BANK // As Americans today go to cast their votes for their  next president, thousands of Palestinian-Americans in the occupied Palestinian  territories will already have had their say.
Among Palestinians  generally, two attitudes toward the elections seem to prevail. On the one hand,  many see the vote as potentially crucial for the world and America. On the  other, few hold out much hope that, whatever the result, Palestinians will gain  much.
For Palestinian-Americans, the two positions seem to go together.
“I  think it’s one of the most important elections in my lifetime, in terms of what  is needed to fix not just the global economic situation but how people and  countries deal with each other,” said Kareem Shehadeh, a lawyer and the chairman  of the board of the American-Palestinian Chamber of Commerce. The Palestinian  issue, however, is “very low on the agenda” of any new administration, said Mr  Shehadeh. “In 2009, I don’t think either party will have any real effect on the  situation here.”
Basil Ayyish, a telecommunications professional, said from a Palestinian  perspective the election was insignificant. “American foreign policy is so  entrenched in the Israeli narrative and Zionist objectives that I don’t think  any president will change that.”
Nevertheless, Mr Ayyish also called the  election “vitally important”.
“For Americans and the international  community it’s very important, because it will help set the tone for decades to  come.” No organised attempt has been made by either the Obama or McCain  campaigns to solicit the votes of eligible voters in the West Bank.
According to figures from the US Embassy, nearly 80,000 US citizens live in  the West Bank and Gaza, though that includes Jewish settlers. The number of  Palestinian-Americans is estimated at around 40,000.
The community is a  fairly significant one because of its affluence. Palestinians sought their  fortunes in America both before and after 1948. In the 1990s, many returned to  help build what they thought would become a Palestinian state. Between Ramallah  and Nablus lies Dear Dibwan, a village of large villas built almost exclusively  with American money brought back by those who returned. Today, with the  political situation in disarray, the village lies almost empty for much of the  year.
Those who remain have kept a keen eye on the presidential elections, however,  and most appear to hope for a Barack Obama victory, regardless of the impact on  Palestinians.
“We hope that the trend Obama is bringing will help change  some of the ideas and concepts that have prevailed in the White House over the  past eight years,” said Mr Shehadeh.
John McCain is viewed with suspicion  because he is seen as representing continuity with the current administration,  universally unpopular with Palestinians.
“I think a McCain administration will most likely carry on some of the  policies that the current administration is advocating, whether domestically or  internationally,” said Hani Murad, who works in a United Nations  agency.
“An Obama administration I think… I hope… will change course and  have a more rational understanding of the American interest and global issues in  general.”
Nevertheless, Mr Obama does not escape criticism, and not only  for his attempts at wooing the pro-Israel vote. Mr Ayyish recalled a McCain  rally at which the Republican contender defended Mr Obama from a heckler calling  him “an Arab” by countering that the Democratic candidate was “a decent family  man”.
“Rather than saying ‘so what’, this just lent credence to the Arab-baiting of this campaign. Part of the attack on Obama is that he is somehow less than an American, because of his foreign name and foreign connections.” But Mr Ayyish said Mr Obama had not dealt well with the negative campaigning, especially on the issue of his personal relationship with Rashid Khalidi, the prominent Palestinian-American academic, with whom he was at university.
“Obama hasn’t dispelled this issue the way I wish he would. The fact that  Khalidi is Palestinian is not something he should be criticised for,” Mr Ayyish  said. Mr Khalidi, a professor of Middle East studies at Columbia University in  New York, has served as an adviser to Palestinian diplomats.
The race  issue, said Mr Murad, was not only about Mr Obama being an African-American, but  also about his father’s Muslim roots and the fact that he has an Arab middle  name.
“Had Obama been purely African Christian, his colour would still have been an  issue,” Mr Murad said. The race factor, he said, was an important reason why Mr  Obama was not further ahead in the opinion polls. Mr Ayyish said he was  “shocked” that the race is as close as it is.
Mr Shehadeh, meanwhile,  said anything but an Obama victory would be a “disaster”. “If Sarah Palin can  become a president, I can become a president.”
